FUGITIVE AUTHOR HOME PAGE

Amazon Partner

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

ADVERTISE HERE
REACH OUT AND TOUCH A LARGE LITERARY WORLD

Advertisments

ZEDWORK

ZIZZOO
Online digital publisher. Offers outcomes based learning material, communities & testing to students around the world www.Zizzoo.com

The Monogamy Gene

Premier Straight Talking Topical Online Magazine
 : with readers input : expert critique : access to online art : fiction : images :



 

MONOGAMOUS GENE?

    American scientists have created a monogamy gene which transforms promiscuous meadow voles into faithful rodents. Researchers at the Yerkes National Primate Research Centre of Emory University and Atlanta, Georgia's Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience (CBN) in the United States said their rodent results could help to explain the neurobiology of romantic love. Researcher Larry Young says, "Our study provides evidence in a comparatively simple animal model, that changes in the activity of a single gene profoundly can change a fundamental social behaviour of animals within a species." The scientists used a harmless virus to transfer the gene for a key hormone involved in sexual behaviour from monogamous prairie voles into the brains of their randy relatives, the meadow voles. After the gene transfer, the previously promiscuous meadow voles had less of a roving eye and showed a distinct preference for their current partners.

Gene Genies? Or is it too much fiddling with your own brothers and sisters?

Now I know why they call it the ‘common’ vole! This is great in theory, but what about if you are already married to a rat of the highest order? You see infidelity is genetic. I knew that all along. Look at the Royal family. For starters they have enjoyed more incest than ‘Gorillas in the Mist’.

Did you know that the Royals across Europe are riddled with dodgy genes? Like Pedigree dogs they have some worrying long term defects that while it keeps the blood as blue as ink they share a common threat and possible extinction of the Monarchy. Well, we live in hope. Look at Charlie’s ‘jughandles’. He looks like a taxi with the doors left open. Or a great impression of the F.A. Cup. Princess Margaret died with a lot of issues buried with her. Living in the shadow of her sister for all those years, must have been difficult. Never finding love. Drinking herself to a premature death and doing her duty by smoking for England. Congenital problems. Princess Anne was once married to Captain Mark Phillips. Then the marriage suffered after only a few years due to a gene in the frontal lobe that means she prefers horses to men and another gene that is obviously due to the lack of imagination involved with her hairstyle.

Easily ‘throne’ by all this?

William is spookily the spit of his Mum but Harry looks like one of his Uncle’s!

Edward and Andrew? What a right pair of ‘prairie hats’?

Philip, has the social skills of a Mars bar.

The Queen looks, permanently, like she has had a disappointing bowel experience.

And all the offspring of Nazis! Yes, Prince Michael’s dad was an SS officer.

In the long Term..inator

Mind you, so was Arnold Shwartzenegger’s! If the Illuminati and the Bilderbergers get their way and have him elected President at the next election, it will be the Fourth Reich for sure. Trust the Californians to vote in an overgrown women abusing, drug taking, Hitler loving, action hero, who has the personality of a paper-cup. Watch out for a muscle bound megalomaniac who wants to end our existence.

One thing, about the Regina’s. They share one, albeit ironic, truth (apart from their amassed wealth from us) and that is an inherited gene that produces their extreme and consistent lack of taste.

Why did the Queen allow her children to wear her wardrobe for It’s-A-Knockout back in the eighties?

Can’t our Sovereign try a different catalogue or something? She dresses like a sofa from DFS. The hats are plonked on her head, just as her Mother did her own, resembling a giant satellite dish made from dyed papier mache, satsuma netting, and bunting. Between them all they must need one of their estates just to house these atrocities in headgear. You probably can walk into the West Wing of Kensington Palace and wind up swept away in an avalanche of tacky hats. You can excuse this offence at Ascot where toffs like to look like tits, but for the Queen of England to continually dress like a mutant Munchkin from Oz is too much for her subjects’ eyes to bear.

What happened to the Queen Mother’s hats that were not used for the Eden Project? What about those utilised for military reconnaissance aircraft in the Iraq war, now she has gone to that castle in the air?

HRH throws her hat in first

Apparently they have been auctioned all over the world by the Freemasons. They were far too gaudy even for their own ‘dressing up like twats rituals’. ‘Knight Templars’ in Lodges across the globe preferred them to their usual regalia bought from Oxfam shops but decided that they were getting in the way of their jewellery and orbs. As a secret society you would have thought the daft old sods would have remembered that the Queen at a state ceremony only wears a little Tiara. It’s bad enough having to ‘Knight’ somebody with a bloody long sharp sword without a giant hat nearly having your eye out.

Even Robert Kennedy was a ‘Bilderberger’. A secret member of that clandestine outfit for the rich and influential. They called him ‘Bob the Bilderberger’.

Here, below is the leader of the Illuminati now, president of the most wealthy gathering of twisted little minds on the planet. He is also a Freemason. Cyril Timkins. “The Grand Master Elect of the Order of Princely Mason’s apprentices NVQ.” He is also referred to by his brotherhood as “Good Knighty Knight, of the Gross Rosary Order and Architypetypetypetypical Architect of the Simon Templar, Upper Lower of The Inner Outer.”

He loves his very own Queen Mum’s hat and wants to keep it to pleasure his wife.

Cyril’s wife says, “I think it really tops Cyril off. As Grand Pontiff he can look just as silly as all those pricks down the Lodge. I like his new beret so much I want one to use at bedtime. If only I could find out where to put the batteries in?

Are you ‘On the Square?’

Freemasons have been around longer than bricklayers. Like bricklayers they are Fascists too, but that is where the resemblance ends. The ‘compass and square’ insignia has a ’G’ in the middle of it. Because? All bent coppers who are masons are ‘Gee’s. Luckily not every bent copper is a Freemason otherwise we would have to turn every single one of our Police stations into Masonic Lodges.

It’s a Mason what you can find out.

It all started during the Reformation. Suddenly, there was a need for more than double the amount of churches, what with the protestants wanting somewhere not to turn up to, on a Sunday, as well. Masons became in short supply. Unlike builders today, Masons were employed, ‘Man and Boy’ on a single project, i.e. A Cathedral or Monastery. They did not know what a brick extension was. Contemporary ‘builders’ offer the illusion they are Master Craftsmen and it might seem to take them as long to build a brick bar-b-q as a Cathedral but what ‘brickey-ing ’is to stonemasonry might as well be the same as of what, say, Argos is to Harrods. Stonemasons never came around your house to start the mixer up and then piss off directly to another job or down the boozer leaving ‘compo’ spattering your windows and washing. To come back three hours later and take a leak on your Dahlias.

Perry Mason was not a Freemason. For a start he was hardly able to climb ladders, being in a wheelchair, and used to make a lot of excuses about having to hunt murderers rather than pick up a trowel.

Design and ‘Billed’

Masons although scarce were paid poorly. In fact most of them just lived in Masonettes. However, they knew how much they were in demand and went down the pub (now called ‘Lodges’) together with the architects and planners to devise a revolt. They were fed up with people mason them about.

Generally, they had spent many years with the same crew, sometimes all their working life. Day in day out, they worked alongside the same ‘skins’. Miles away from their women for years at a time. It was all very sweaty and dusty work. Which was quite nice for the effeminate ones. Local innuendos were banded about while the craftsmen giggled and chiselled. More than stone blocks were bonded. Masons became homoerotic. They liked to hang out with each other in the ‘Gents’. Often they would take building plans in the toilet and literally pour all over them. After a few ‘brewski’s’ they had forgotten what the feck they were doing in the pub.

So instead they experimented with silly little games. Queer handshakes and undressing or rolling up their trouser legs for fun and because they were already buggered with the drink as well. That is why they are called ‘Stoned masons”.

Nothing has changed. Freemasons are called that because most of them are separated from their wives because of their raving homosexuality. They call themselves a ‘secret society’ but its all a smokescreen for the fact that they end up too pissed to remember what the fiddly feck they went to the Lodge for in the first place. It’s not a secret society, it’s just a lot of memory loss between pissheads. The dressing up games still prevail, although lingerie is only allowed for the “Great Worshipful Architect” and then only in private.

Not all architects are girlies. But all the ones I’ve ever met are always up for ‘cross dressing.’ They do a lot of ‘swearing in’ probably because the silly garb is the wrong size. They become very cross dressed then.

Imagine a ‘apprentice’ joining and swearing in.

“Feck. This bloody robes a bit tight under the arms. The ruff collar is bloody itchy too. Have you got one anything in extra large?”

Then the “Great Master and Johnson’s, Noble Baron knight of the exalted hodcarriers” will bend over and whisper into the ear of the kneeling novice.

“What do you think this place is? Feckin’ marks and Sparks you tit? Suits you, ya bastard.”

Freemasons today call it “The craft.” They certainly may be very ‘crafty’ but as far as stonemasonry is concerned or architecture for that matter, my cat probably has more construction ability than most of them.

Her Royal Highness and your Majesty, in one of her many silly hats.

Masonic

What have the freemasons got to do with your genes? Well, all this freemasonry clandestine stuff amounts to one thing. Frustrated men who need to wield some power over others because of their basic insecurity. They need to be ‘on the square’ to survive their own frustrating and needy environment.

My brother in Law is a Freemason and he beats up on my sister. He loves to control more vulnerable people. He is subversive and cruel. So he probably meets all the criteria back at the Lodge. Well, it is a very macho deal. They all seem to come from the pre-sexist age of dinosaurs. “A women’s place is in the wrong” and all that. Big tough men of position who can’t get what they want out of life, without having secrets and getting people to pull a few strings for them.

Not exactly behind the ethos of democracy is it? Hardly, for the good of equal opportunities, eh?

Who else do you know avoids paying tax and dresses like overgrown choirboys with silly sticks in their hands?

Ok, Ken Dodd doesn’t count.

Goodbye Normal Gene.

The once voluptuous vole proved that by changing a gene it was prepared to stop knobbing about. Through genetic engineering and identifying all our genes we will be able to be just the person we want to be and more.

I believe that ‘gene therapy’ in the next 20 years or sooner will be used to change criminal behaviour, cure cancer, and help your child concentrate at school. It will stamp out depression and mental illness and even help you change your sex. It will improve your sex life and stop you getting pregnant.

I can’t wait to have my genes sorted. People say they are that tight they show off my privates.

The privates didn’t mind it’s the Sergeant that was annoyed.

Lets look at what incestuous human breeding affected the monarchy.

“Meet my sister the wife”

Here is a clue.

Inbreeding was very common among the royal families of Europe, and it has been linked as the cause of the widespread number of cases of hemophilia in the families.  The presence of hemophilia in the royalty of Europe started with Queen Victoria of England. Victoria is thought to be the original carrier for the recessive X-linked hemophilia gene, which lead to over twenty members of royal families inheriting the disease in just over 100 years. The disease was spread throughout Europe, because Queen Victoria's children and grandchildren married into many different royal houses in Europe to create political alliances.  Females can only been carriers for the rare blood clotting disease if one of there X chromosomes contains the deleterious recessive allele. Moreover, males inherit the disease if their X chromosome carries the gene for hemophilia.

Hemophilia spread rapidly through the British Royal house for several generations, and inbreeding in the family was seen as a major cause of the deleterious recessive allele's frequently through the lines of the British Royalty.  Moreover, the disease was also spread into the Royal houses of Russia and Spain by descendants of Queen Victoria. Victoria gave birth to three children with the hemophilia allele; Leopold, Alice, and Beatrice. Alice then gave birth to two female carriers and one male hemophiliac.  One of the carrier daughters was Alexandra, also known as Alix. Alix was married to Nicholas the Czar of Russia in 1894.  Alix then had tremendous pressure on her to produce a male heir.  She finally gave birth to a male, Alexis, but he had hemophilia. This lead to political unrest in Russia, and the Royal Family was executed by a firing squad during the Russian Revolution.

Hemophilia was also spread into the Spanish Royal Family when Victoria Eugenie, a hemophilia carrier and daughter of Beatrice, married Alfonso XIII, the king of Spain. The marriage was arranged to try to bring Spain and England closer together.  This attempt did not work when Beatrice gave birth to two sons with hemophilia.  This event led to increase anti-British feeling in Spain, because many believed that the Spanish monarchy's blood line was polluted by this British Princess.

The events in Russia and Spain along with an increase in British hemophiliacs led to political unrest and instability. Many people believe these cases of inbreeding and hemophilia to be a contributing cause to World War I.  Moreover, a mystery surrounds the originator of the hemophilia gene in England.  No ancestor of Queen Victoria showed any evidence of hemophilia, so several theories arose on the gene's origin. One theory is that Victoria was the victim of a mutation that could have been due to years of inbreeding in British Royalty. Another interesting theory is that Victoria's mother had an affair because of the intense pressure of producing an heir, and Edward Duke of Kent was not Victoria's biological father (Stevens 1991).

http://www.as.wvu.edu/~kgarbutt/QuantGen
/Gen535_2_2004/Inbreeding_Humans.htm

You see, we all boast about coming from ‘good stock’. It seems that if we look at our family trees on ‘Friends Re-united’ more closely we might regret it for the rest of our lives. I was engaged to my first cousin but only because I didn’t have a bike.

Charles Darwin had 10 children and he was married to his first cousin. I suppose ‘Emma’ was his natural selection.  Just because she was his cousin doesn’t mean people tried to make a monkey out of him.

I believe Sir Isaac Newton fancied his own sister a bit. Mind you he did discover the theory of relativity.
 

All content on this site is subject to copyright © 2000/2006
If you wish to use anything    either text or graphics   please ask permission
JUST ASK MY DAD - CITIZEN MONKEY

Looking for a particular subject. Search for any word or phrase!


Too much information? Try the alternative ...
Advanced Search

SHORT CUTS